Monthly Archives: December 2015

A Happy Christmas to all our readers…

Holly HWe realise that there have been fewer posts on our site this year—and, after all, it could be thought there is only so much that can be written.

However, there has been, in 2015, more Jac’s sisters’ activity, letters, conversations—with many disclosures concerning Jim Perrin—than we have yet used. Even so, although our posts were less frequent, a quite remarkable number of people have been reading them, and catching up with the archive.

Our intention remains to highlight any details we find, or are given, which might be of interest to readers and to continue whenever possible, both for Jac’s sake—and for the sake of others—’to set the record straight’.

We would like to thank all those who have contacted us this year and who have helped us in any way, and we send our very best wishes for Christmas and for 2016.

Elisabeth Simpson, Caroline Hardaker and Alex Richardson.

TwitterFacebookLinkedInGoogle+

Jim Perrin’s ‘Terms of Bereavement’

On page 29 of West Jim Perrin gave details of a night he purported to have spent in the hospital whilst Jac was a patient there. (She had been admitted in the late Wednesday afternoon until mid-Wednesday of the next week as she was desperately ill in the final stage of her terminal cancer.) Intimate ‘details’ we could hardly believe. He told how ‘she was undisturbed after eight o’clock… Nobody arrived to tell me to leave. I crept quietly away at dawn before the routine of the hospital began.’

Today, 07/12/2015, we have spoken with a representative of the hospital concerned and asked them whether a patient in their care, so ill as our sister was, might possibly have been left, as Jim Perrin claimed, ‘undisturbed’ (that is — un-checked!) after 8pm. with no nurse even to look in on her to see if she was sleeping or if she might need some drug to alleviate pain. Could it be? Continue reading

TwitterFacebookLinkedInGoogle+

Jim Perrin’s qualified grief

At first, after reading the lies in West, we reviewed it on several Amazon threads — although they were all later deleted, we supposed at the request of Jim Perrin! We have said in several other posts: ‘Who but HE would care, or would be sufficiently interested, or would have the motive?’ — this surely must be so? — and to this day any attempt to post as ‘jacssisters’ is automatically blocked. Subsequently we decided to show those reviews on our own site in order to gain further coverage, and by writing our posts we have sought to expose the many lies that this deceitful man has written about our sister. Continue reading

TwitterFacebookLinkedInGoogle+