Tag Archives: The Observer

Did Roger Alton, a friend of Jim Perrin, back the wrong horse?

Roger Alton denied our family the chance to refute the claims which Jim Perrin had made about our sister.  The author’s assertions were extraordinary:

‘ Jacquetta [Jac] my lover, wife and friend of 40 years’

‘A previous man in her life [we know very well to whom he refers] had BEATEN HER savagely about the head.’

(Of her cancer) ‘She had surgery — chances of surviving beyond a very few YEARS minimal.  In the event, MERCIFULLY, it would be only weeks.’  (Our capitals…)  He also wrote, how dared he do so, that he was with Jac when she died!

Jim Perrin’s article was full of lies and ‘implications’ and we were profoundly shocked as those who now read the truth in our posts will readily understand.  Surely, anyone faced with such wicked lies about a loved member of their own family — and so soon after they had died — would have felt equally distressed and would also have wished to disclaim them? Continue reading

TwitterFacebookLinkedInGoogle+

Should Roger Alton be thanked for favouring Jim Perrin?

Had Roger Alton, in 2005, agreed to our family’s request — as an intellectually honest editor ought to have done (given the circumstances which we explained to him) — instead of favouring his friend and climbing partner by denying that request, we — in all probability — would never have created the site which by now has enabled others to access some of the more unpalatable truths about Jim Perrin; and to embolden them to come forward themselves with details of their own experiences.

There can be no doubt that Roger Alton should have allowed our voice to be heard in 2005.  Perhaps our response would have restrained the author when he was writing West and the knowledge that we had expressed our rightful concern might at least have curbed his Worst Excesses.

But no: Jim Perrin has ‘Friends in High Places’, and he went on to write, with apparent impunity, the book which was such a travesty:  it is noteworthy that some of those involved in the ‘progress’ of the book, and they will know who they are — did not think sufficiently well of it to allow it to be (even) long-listed for the ‘Wales Book of the Year’. And as he was somewhat of a ‘golden boy’ in the Welsh literary hierarchy and had very close ‘friendships’ with many in that circle, this must have considerably shocked Jim Perrin; clearly he had felt his ‘trajectory’ was assured — he wrote in one of his letters to our sister: ‘My work is highly thought of and receives much critical acclaim, my star is rising.’ Continue reading

TwitterFacebookLinkedInGoogle+

Former ‘Observer’ Editor Roger Alton replied to Jac’s Sisters about Jim Perrin

Within an opportunistically short time after Jac died in 2005, Jim Perrin wrote an article about her for the Observer and, we believe, plagiarised the title ‘Touching the Void’, as Joe Simpson already had a book published — to much acclaim — and a film had been made of the book, using the title.

Readers might have thought that the feelings expressed in the article were ‘sensitive’, the author was ‘devastated’, his loss was ‘profound’. But wait — There Was a Book In It.

The truth is that Jim Perrin lied.  We will not use the euphemism ‘economical with the truth’, and we knew that what we read in the Observer was an adulterated blend of slight fact and flagrant fiction which the author had written as ‘autobiography’.

We contacted the editor, who then was Roger Alton, to ask that he would print our rebuttal; after all, as close sisters (and intimate friends) we knew the truth: our sister was not Jim Perrin’s ‘Lover, wife and friend of forty years’, and many of his other claims were wholly false or ‘implication’. Continue reading

TwitterFacebookLinkedInGoogle+