As of today Jim Perrin has not died of his ‘Terminal Lung Cancer’ — the diagnosis he claimed to have been given by the medical profession — and for which, he was at pains to explain, he had specifically elected to receive no treatment of any kind; neither surgical nor palliative: no intervention whatsoever. He made a great point of this. It seems that it needed to be said, otherwise how could he have justified his decision not to accept the cancer treatment (which would almost certainly be the course of action for anyone genuinely diagnosed) without giving the lie to his elaborate subterfuge: his ‘explanation’ was to pre-empt suspicion.
In ‘West:’ (published in July 2010) he wrote in detail and at length about his ‘illness’, and in an article in the ‘Times’, 13/07/2010, he added: ‘Post script: My cancer — not worth mentioning in my view [yet here, clearly, he is doing just that] — carries a one chance in ten of survival beyond five years. In November I’ll be three years in.’ So stoic; so brave…
The consultant* who was kind enough to contribute notes on the subject, 6/05/2014, wrote: ‘In WEST Perrin states that ”he has upper lobe carcinoma with metasteses in both lungs”. This is stage 4 cancer and it would carry the likely prognosis of a matter of a few months if untreated.’ Later in his notes he says: ‘I find the account of the diagnosis of Perrin’s cancer to be very unlikely, and the lack of progression of a tumour is strong evidence that he has not, and has never had lung cancer.’
So: it would appear that Jim Perrin has the most remarkable, if not incredible, powers of survival particularly when one considers that he dated his ‘diagnosis’ to 2007, now well over a decade ago, and was reported by Sir Andrew Motion to have said ‘he had refused conventional medicine.’ Elsewhere, writing himself: ‘Pneumonectomy, chemotherapy and radiography treatments were suggested but I brusquely walked away from them.’ It is also of interest, and worth reminding readers, that several years ago he had let it be known that he was suffering from liver cancer — only later choosing ‘terminal lung cancer’ to be his fatal illness. It really is a miracle that he is still alive…
* * * * *
It seems to us the saddest of all ironies that Jac, for whose sake we set up this site was, genuinely, diagnosed with cancer and, although accepting of all the care and treatment offered to her, tragically she died barely nine months later — this in stark contrast to Jim Perrin’s evidently dishonest and distasteful accounts of his own ‘terminal illness’.
It added to the trauma of our sister’s last months that he (Jim Perrin was then her partner) actively controlled her and on many occasions actually prevented her contact with family and friends; particularly in her final weeks of life. During this time he silenced the telephone and went so far at one point as to change the security code on her vehicle so that she was unable to leave him — this occurred whilst her ‘Yorkshire’ sister was visiting her. It was discovered when they had decided to go out together and Jac found she was prevented from starting her own car. Of course when she realised what he had done she was beyond furious.
We have been told by a dear friend of Jac’s (they had been close since their children were tiny) how Jim Perrin highhandedly telephoned her to cancel an arrangement she had made with Jac, to visit the sea. In view of Jac’s frailty by now, this friend was to drive to her house to collect her and take her there, as Jac had said how very much she longed to go… Jim Perrin told her that Jac no longer wished it, and he told Jac that it was her friend who had had cancelled !!! Jac never knew why her friend had ‘let her down’ and it was only on discovering our site that her friend learned the full horror of Jim Perrin’s behaviour. It was a truly wicked intervention: Jac, terminally ill, would have had such solace: she loved the sea. These are three of many despicable examples of how Jim Perrin tried to exert power over our sister; not only during their time together but, in these cases, towards the very end of her life — truly, his behaviour was unconscionable.
* * * * *
As can be seen Jim Perrin did not die of the liver cancer from which he had pretended to be suffering some eighteen years ago, and he has not succumbed to his ‘lung cancer’ — the story of which he so painstakingly proclaimed in interviews and at book festivals around the country at the time of the publication of his book ‘West’ — and, indeed, since then. We have been told that even to the present day he refers to his (non-existent) ‘cancer’ giving people to understand that he Has Not Been Well At All… Of course although he does not have cancer it is known that in its many forms it can strike, terrifyingly, at any time and the chances of anyone being diagnosed are very high indeed: so it might well be that he does develop it in the future. We hope that Jim Perrin remembers the old adage: ‘Be careful what you wish for’ as it would be such bad luck, after all this time.
Surely, now, it must be realised by all who have been taken in by him that his previous pretences were just that. Entirely fictitious and fabricated falsehoods constructed to manipulate their emotional responses and thereby to gain sympathy, support and, as he did, advantages. Jim Perrin, the author, is also a masterly deceiver.
We need no caveat of ‘we believe’ to say this. On the subject of his illnesses; his relationships; his treatment of his partners; his violence; his fraudulent behaviour (for just one example, his successful hoodwinking over the years of the Child Support Agency — now the CMS) etc. etc. the evidence is all documented and readily available should we be called upon to provide it.
The first of these posts would seem to drive a coach and horses through Jim Perrin’s ‘story’.